Restoration
The art of restoration has evolved
greatly over the years. Innovation
and a wider sense of conservation
have gone hand in hand with the
increasing rarity and value of wonderful
old instruments.
In
order to be a fine restorer one
must first be a fine maker, but
a large and flexible tool-kit of
techniques and experiences specific
to restoration is also essential.
I've learned from many different
schools of restoration and employ
innovations from fields as diverse
as dentistry, x-ray technology,
acoustics, and art restoration,
among others. Perhaps equally important
is an abiding interest in the work
of those makers who have come before
and a moral compass with which to
guide one's hands.
As
a restorer of fine instruments it
is my responsibility to conserve
and maintain the integrity of each
individual instrument entrusted
to my care. I approach each restoration
on a highly individual basis, for
just as no two instruments are alike,
no two restorations are alike. I
learn from each instrument I work
on, from the original maker as well
as from all those through whose
hands the instrument has passed
before reaching mine. If I can preserve,
rather than replace, I choose to
do so. I never "fix" a
"problem" that is not
a problem.
While
there are many things one can do
to preserve/restore the body and
enhance the sound of a fine
old instrument, there
are some things that should never
be done. All practices considered
irreversible – such as re-graduation
or varnish removal – are highly
unethical. Irreversible work is
wrong because it violates an instrument's
historic and cultural integrity.
For better or worse as seen today,
a maker's fundamental work should
be left and maintained for posterity.
For example, some might argue that
an older instrument could be made
to sound better if re-graduated,
which may or may not be true. Regardless,
it is important to remember that
what was thought to be "good"
in the past is different today and
will surely be different tomorrow.
When one makes irreversible changes
to an old instrument, it is lifted
out of the context within which
it was created, and something is
lost forever. Aesthetics change,
but cultural artifacts should not
– they are our heritage.
I
take great pride in being able to
maximize an instrument's potential,
but I strive to leave as small a
"footprint" on each instrument
as possible, mindful of the fact
that I am just a brief stop along
the path of that instrument's long
life.
Web design by Palmer
Media. Please contact
us with any comments or problems
related to this site.
Copyright © 2003-2010 Anthony Lane